Posts Tagged ‘ a-firm-believer

Addon Domain Spamming With Wordpress and Any Other CMS 11 November 2009 at 7:46 am by admin

I got this question from Primal in regards to my post on Building Mininets

Eli,

I like the post and your entire site. Thanks for sharing your knowledge. One thing confuses me about this particular tactic. Where are you getting the content from? You mentioned Audioscrobbler and Youtube API but I am not focusing on a music niche. The “widely available car db” sounds more like something I could use. Can you say where you would get something like this from? Also is there any reason why I should use customized pages instead of a CMS like Wordpress to generate these kinds of sites?

Upon a glancing read this question seems to focus too much on the exact example used in the post. Yet if you really read the multipart question thoroughly and get to its core it’s a FANTASTIC question that really needs an answer in more depth than what I would put in a comment response. The mininet building post isn’t about how to use APIs and RSS feeds to get content. Nor is it about creating a custom CMS or doing multiple installs of the same site structure (I covered that in depth in my SEO Empire post and called them ANT Scripts). The real down to brass tax gem behind the technique is understanding how to do Addon Domain Spam via environmental variables such as HTTP_HOST to create a lot of sites from a single install of ANYTHING. I’m absolutely a firm believer that addon domain spam is the future of webspam. Subdomains had their day and now its time for figuring out creative ways to create a ton of unique sites from a single platform. This doesn’t always have to be done through addon domains and as mentioned in the comments can be done through other ways such as editing the httpd.config. For now though I wanted to focus on the basics such as using addon domains and if you’d like to go cheap about it subdomains, and let the SEO ingenuity naturally evolve from there.

To answer your question yes you can use databases to help with the content for these sites. Check out my Madlib Sites post for some great ideas on how to accomplish that and use databases. As for the second part YES you can use other CMS’ such as Wordpress!

How To Use Wordpress To Do Addon Domain Spam
I got several emails from people asking how to create a wordpress plugin to accomplish this technique as well as a comment from the longtime reader PhatJ. I realize at first thought this sounds like a complicated process to be able to convert wordpress over to being able to read multiple addon domains and treat them as multiple installs and probably require some sort of plugin being created, but as with most things the simple solution is often the best.

The easiest and most effective way to convert any CMS to be used for addon domains that I’ve found is to simply edit the config files. No joke, that’s seriously usually all it ever takes. In my wordpress wp-config.php file I grabbed the line that declared the database:

define(’DB_NAME’, ‘database1′);

I replaced it with a simple IF ELSE statement to check for the domain and define the appropriate database:

if ( $_SERVER["HTTP_HOST"] == ‘domain1.com’ ) {
define(’DB_NAME’, ‘database1′);
}
elseif($_SERVER["HTTP_HOST"] == ‘domain2.com’){
define(’DB_NAME’, ‘database2′);
}else {
define(’DB_NAME’, ‘database1′);
}

Then I just pull each database in the browser or mass wordpress installer script and setup each blog as if it was separate.

To show you it in action I put up a single Wordpress install on a subdomain on Bluehat. I then added a second database and put that code into the wp-config.php. Looking at each you’d have no idea they were a single wordpress install. See for yourself :)

Domain 1: http://addtest1.bluehatseo.com
Domain 2: http://addtest2.bluehatseo.com

Thanks for your question Primal!

Here is the original:
Addon Domain Spamming With Wordpress and Any Other CMS

+ Yahoo! Microsoft Partnership: In Search of a Strong Suit - SEM Synergy Extras By admin 29 July 2009 at 3:59 pm and have No Comments

Yahoo! and Microsoft announced their long-awaited search partnership today, and the search engine marketing community is all abuzz.

SEM Synergy logo

Today on Bruce Clay, Inc.’s weekly podcast, SEM Synergy, Yahoo!’s Search Submit program was the subject of the show. Of course, in light of the Binghoo development, strategies aimed at search engine optimization for Yahoo! search may be reevaluated.

That’s the drawback of recording a show beforehand. If I could re-interview Amy Figliuolo, vice president, sales at search marketing firm Position Technologies and an expert in managing Yahoo! Search Submit campaigns, I’d probably ask a few different questions knowing what I know now.

For instance, does Figliuolo believe the Search Submit program will continue once Bing completely powers Yahoo! search? I’d think a profitable program like Search Submit would be integrated into the newly combined Binghoo search platform.

Whatever the case may be in the future, I believe Yahoo! should remain a target for SEO today. The companies’ search consolidation may not be fully implemented until two years after federal regulatory approval. So, search marketers must still consider how Yahoo!’s well-established paid inclusion program might work for them.

Bruce Clay is a firm believer in Search Submit as a way to manage a site’s Yahoo! search listings with control and flexibility while freeing up time to optimize a site for bot crawls. Figliuolo offers great information to help guide marketers to the best Search Submit fit. Despite the potentially game-changing partnership, it’s really not the time to abandon a Yahoo! search strategy — though it would be short-sighted not to consider how the deal will affect SEO and the search industry.

Bing and Yahoo! logo mashup

Danny Sullivan, editor in chief of the search marketing news site Search Engine Land, is conducting a poll, asking participants to answer “yes”, “no” and “don’t know” to the question: Do you think selling search will hurt Yahoo’s prospects of being a major web destination or not?

As of this morning Danny reported that two-thirds of respondents had answered “yes.” But I rather agree with Kevin Newcomb’s assessment that the deal will be good for Yahoo!, Bing, and even searchers.

I mean, why is it that in the marketing world we talk about finding what you’re good at and capitalizing on it, and yet when Yahoo! takes this approach, the plan is blasted as a death knell? Yahoo! has never been all about search. Yahoo! is a media company, a leading news portal, an online service provider and Internet property manager. Search has long played a large role in the company’s media mix, but I leave it up to Yahoo! to decide whether or not pursuing innovation in the search sector is the best strategy for their own future.

Also, who else sees this partnership as the industry’s best shot at a competitor to rival Google? As the process for antitrust approval gets underway, it’s clear that federal officials generally feel that “Competition is typically improved by having more competitors, not fewer.” But when it comes to this David and Goliath story, I think two heads are probably better than one when it comes to the best chance for the underdogs to compete.

I don’t think we should be writing off search’s number two and number three yet. We’ll have to wait to see if the deal will meet regulatory approval. And if they do, I think Yahoo! and Microsoft deserve a chance to show their true combined power. In the never-ending saga of search musical chairs, why designate the Binghoo deal as a death sentence when it could very well be the start of a beautiful marriage?

Continued here: 
Yahoo! Microsoft Partnership: In Search of a Strong Suit - SEM Synergy Extras